Alexander Kotzen vs Julius Tverijonas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W W L
Form
L L L W L W W L L LH2H: Kotzen 1 - 0 Tverijonas
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kotzen winning 2 and Tverijonas winning 1. The last match between Kotzen and Tverijonas was at the M15 Parnu, 04-08-2021, First, Clay with Alexander Kotzen getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alexander Kotzen | 1 |
| Julius Tverijonas | 0 |
M15 Parnu(04-08-2021)
3
6
7
5
6
2
| Kotzen | Stats | Tverijonas |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 890 | Ranking | 869 |
| 812 | Highest Rank | 776 |
| 24 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 62% (103-64) | Career Total W/L | 55% (83-67) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kotzen VS Tverijonas H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Julius Tverijonas
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
74%
(
76 of
103)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Kotzen VS Tverijonas H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 3:3:0 | Average Match Time | 3:3:0 |
| 61% (63/103) | 1st Serve % | 74% (76/103) |
| 67% (42/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (40/76) |
| 43% (17/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
| 50% (52/103) | Return Points Win % | 43% (44/103) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alexander Kotzen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Alexander Kotzen
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
18
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
20 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
9
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
8 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Aidan Mchugh
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
13
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Alexander Kotzen
42%
(
32 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
7
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Alexander Kotzen
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Adit Sinha
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Keshav Chopra
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cleeve Harper
Player
Alexander Kotzen
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Alexander Kotzen
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
65 of
89)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Julius Tverijonas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Julius Tverijonas
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandros Skorilas
Player
Julius Tverijonas
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Julius Tverijonas
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
75%
(
75 of
100)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julius Tverijonas
Player
Filippo Mondini
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Julius Tverijonas
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
79%
(
48 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Krainer
Player
Julius Tverijonas
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Julius Tverijonas
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (103/64) | Win/Loss | 55% (83/67) |
| 61% (230/150) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (177/154) |
| 55% (1956/1604) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1558/1450) |
| 63% (84/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (32/18) |
| 56% (9/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (42/36) |
| 56% (10/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (9/13) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 396 | Aces Total | 175 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 205 | Total Double Faults | 152 |
| 1:5:44 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 395.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.72 |
| 62% (4307/6970) | 1st Serve % | 64% (3231/5032) |
| 69% (2986/4307) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2021/3231) |
| 52% (1398/2663) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (807/1801) |
| 45% (281/629) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (223/523) |
| 39% (2684/6858) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2056/4984) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 57% (4/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 62% (99/61) | Futures W/L | 58% (83/61) |
| 62% (101/163) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (78/142) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 48% (23/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (18/34) |
| 48% (22/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 89% (100/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (84/71) |
| 11% (100/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (84/13) |
| 21% (67/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (64/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
